Fork-Tongued Pols, Knife-Stabbed Allies, and the Spoon-Fed Children

AS U.S. COLLEGES and universities futilely attempt to cope with ‘micro-intifada’ training, comprised of protests, occupations, and violence from pro-Hamas demonstrators in ‘Gaza Solidarity Encampments’ on campus, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu struggles to save his nation, faith, political career, and legacy. For him, it’s existential. 

There have been rumors since early May that the International Criminal Court may issue an arrest warrant against him and other Israeli leaders for allegedly waging a genocidal campaign in Gaza. News isn’t always true these days, to be sure, but it seems Netanyahu has been fairly restrained and sober in his response to the Hamas threat. And, IMO, he has also been too deferential to the corrupt senile occupant of the White House, Joe Biden, who seems to think the Israeli leader should roll over and play dead, but maybe not before the I.C.C. acts. 

“Israel expects the leaders of the free world to come out strongly against this scandalous step, a step that will harm the self-defense not only of the State of Israel, but of all democracies,” the  P.M. prodded world leaders. Netanyahu, who typically overstates his positions, said that issuing a warrant against him would be an “antisemitic hate crime.” And why not? Isn’t everyone antisemitic these days? And isn’t everything a ‘hate’ crime?

The illicit and corrupt Biden regime says it opposes such an action against Netanyahu because Israel has not recognized the I.C.C.’s jurisdiction, a claim the U.S. also made over I.C.C. actions against itself in Afghanistan. Russia was quick to point out the hypocrisy that the U.S. not only supported, but encouraged the issuance of I.C.C. warrants against Russian President Vladimir Putin last year for its military action in Ukraine. Yet neither Russia nor Ukraine are parties either.

And still, Biden has done absolutely nothing to lessen the hostilities. If anything, he has fomented dissent by pandering to pro-Hamas protesters at least in part because they are a target demographic in his inexplicable and reprehensible campaign for president. It is also why he now placates them by bringing Gaza refugees to the U.S. and making them U.S. citizens by executive order, something hardly anyone supports or should support, especially in light of the U.S. border crisis. However, despite his inaction, there has slowly been a reduction in violence at the campuses due to arrests, and the occupations have finally begun to be broken up by police. This was a big breakthrough since most school administrators and educators are, like Biden, so ineffectual or are part of the problem themselves.  

Netanyahu has recently become emboldened to make his own demand for the U.S. to crack down on pro-Hamas student protests, calling a failure to do so ‘antisemitism.’ He’s not wrong, but that doesn’t mean he’s right, because in fact, many of the protesters are Jewish themselves. And never mind Palestinians are Arabs and Arabs are Semitic people, too. 

You’d think Biden would have the human decency to at least be embarrassed by his ineptitude, insincerity, and hypocrisy, but he just plays both sides. His is an existential political journey, too. And one he absolutely must lose, if America is to retain any credibility in the world.

The Biden regime recently urged Congress and the hopelessly feckless and naive new House Speaker, Mike Johnson (R-La.), to pony up more big bucks hustled from American taxpayers for Israel, but it was a gratuitous insult to also include funds for Hamas, who, after all, instigated this latest round of violence in the Holy Land. (Would Biden’s handlers similarly offer charitable aid to Russia in addition to funding the Ukraine regime, for example?) 

Also insulting was the amount of money was dwarfed by the heaps of cash and weapons the U.S. has bestowed on Ukraine’s corrupt President Volodymyr Zelensky, though in fairness, Israel has always been the recipient of disproportional aid packages, amounting to $3.8 billion annually, thanks to extremely effective lobbying by AIPAC. A cutback is certainly in order, though the timing is unfortunate.  

AIPAC will be spending oodles of money—in a way, offset by American aid in a cynical sort of way—on the U.S. elections, which is another reason the dangerous kook in the White House is attempting to talk through both sides of his mouth. Even with his rapidly progressing dementia, though, Biden groks the threat from the AIPAC website: “[AIPAC] is the largest pro-Israel PAC in America and contributed more resources directly to candidates than any other PAC. 98% of AIPAC-backed candidates won their general election races in 2022.” (Emphasis added.) And as between Biden and pro-Israeli Donald Trump, guess who AIPAC will endorse? The only question is whether American Jews will care what AIPAC thinks, given Jews tend to vote  Democrat. They just might not now.

Indeed, Israel clearly learned the business of government from its America masters over the decades, just as Netanyahu learned activism, propaganda, and the art of politics from M.I.T. and Harvard. For anyone not clear on this point need only look at Netayahu’s massive Israeli settlement expansion, turning an obvious provocation into a political fait d’accompli

The pledge of additional aid from the U.S. last month may metaphorically become a mirage in the Negev, however. Biden has placed often changing conditions on how the aid can be used by Jerusalem. And for the most part, Netanyahu had obeyed the Big Guy.

For example, Netanyahu held off on initiating an operation to demolish a massive maze of tunnels to Rafah, on the Israeli border town of Gaza and Egypt which was engineered to deliver weapons and supplies to Palestinians to fight Israel. It was considered the last stronghold of Hamas in Gaza. But it is also being used as a lifeline to transport humanitarian aid to Gazans—at least until Israel issued an evacuation call this month in anticipation of its planned offensive. (A fairly accurate, albeit Arab description is here.) 

Some, but not all in the U.S., including Biden, agreed and still agree with the United Nations, that this operation could be a humanitarian disaster, however, and the American regime is now withholding delivery of long-awaited supplies to its best Middle Eastern ally.

For its part, the State Department has concluded it is “reasonable to assess” that Israel has violated international law by pursuing its military operation in Gaza (a belief echoed by an independent task force), yet remarkably didn’t find its offense such that aid should be withheld. Such conflicting messaging is both confusing and angering its recipient. 

Whether the operation would or would not result in a humanitarian disaster is not dispositive of the fact that the U.S. has unequivocally betrayed Israel by withholding aid, pure and simple. It’s not a good look, nor is it promising for international relationships with present and future allies who will no longer trust American promises of international support or military largess.

That it may, indeed, become a humanitarian crisis, also doesn’t address whether and to what extent Hamas has some culpability here, too. After all, Israel was attacked first by Hamas. The duplicity of the Biden regime continues to amaze. Would it, for example, tell its comrades in Ukraine to stop winning, but still send it weapons bought and paid for by weary U.S. taxpayers? 

A big takeaway is that Rafah was a figurative bomb waiting to explode for years, and should’ve been shut down by Israeli Defense Forces earlier. As it stands on Friday, Israel’s Security Cabinet has voted to expand the Rafah operation while keeping settlement talks with Egyptian mediators open in an effort to obtain the release of at least 128 hostages still held by Hamas since Oct. 7th, the day its terrorists invaded Israel, killing 1,139, taking 200 hostage.

 Egypt waits and worries as to what comes next. After translating it into Hebrew, Netanyahu gave Biden an unequivocal middle finger and sent the I.D.F. to the Palestine side of Rafah to conduct aircraft strikes, which apparently killed ‘terrorists.’ 

As an aside, I don’t recall common usage of the word ‘terrorist’ until Netanyahu arrived on the public scene in the early ‘90s, even though tensions in the region have been present since the establishment of Israel in 1948. He overstates things, so one can only hope, in a perverse sort of way, that they really were terrorists.

Notably on Friday, the U.N. General Assembly voted, 143-9, for a resolution to confer to the “state of Palestine” certain rights and privileges reserved only for member states, which, of course, ‘Palestine’ is not. In fact, most people probably don’t even know the U.N. recognized Palestinian ‘statehood’ for its own purposes back in 2012, allowing it observer status in the Assembly. It’s sort of an international legal fiction. 

But a U.N. member? The U.S., and obviously Israel, voted nay. True statehood would have to be recognized bilaterally with other states. And full U.N. membership will still need to go back to the Security Council. Joe Lauria of Consortium News explains it well, here

The problems with the U.N. resolution are myriad. It defies principles in the U.N. Charter, for one thing. It renders definitions of terms in major international documents into a mockery of law and language, for another. It also essentially rewards terrorism. And it renders the U.S. financially liable for yet another U.N. undertaking—and one it doesn’t even support. And now an Israeli envoy is demanding the U.S. cut U.N. funding, which is actually a good idea. It starts to look a lot like NATO and the foolhardy plan to invite Ukraine to an outdated relic of history at enormous cost to the U.S., both fiscally and politically. 

Sadly, a two-state solution was always rejected by the Palestinian Authority and its military arm, Hamas. Now it is an impossibility, and renders statehood an impossibly fluid concept for the rest of the world. Optimistically, the U.S. may, at least, shed itself of the burden of paying for the U.N., albeit, as it recklessly shifts the money to any of a number of corrupt or hostile states.

As it turns out, back in the U.S., just as many of us suspected, CAIR, the Muslim Brotherhood, and other agitpropists such as George Soros’ Open Society Foundation are behind the bedlam. Most of their useful idiots don’t even know what they’re protesting about, other than evil ‘Zionists,’ transparently meaning all Jews. Ask the protesters, donning their designer unisex keffiyehs, for example, what river and sea it is that they refer to in their chant, ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine shall be free.’ They have no idea

The protesters just tear down the American flag on campus and replace it with a Palestinian one, but we shouldn’t wonder why. After all, they saw former Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her comrades feverishly waving Ukraine flags or watched her unceremoniously and disrespectfully rip up a State of the Union Address delivered by President Trump inside the House chamber. They don’t know any better.

What these student protesters do know is they’re getting paid (!), given tents in which to occupy the campus grounds, and that their demands are being largely met by the Biden regime. An extremely enlightening article about this is here

Their demands for delicious hot meals and regular heath monitoring from school administrators are largely being ignored, though. And why not? It turns out, most aren’t even matriculated, so the schools have no obligation to cater to them. And those demanding passing grades and degrees have done little to earn them. Between this, Covid, and the Occupy movement, this will surely be the stupidest generation ever produced! 

The protesters whine about not having their voices heard, especially by the free-speech advocates they so detest, but it is their acts that makes them repelled. In that regard, they are zealots like those they are defending—they demand one listen to them and by extension, do as they say, without delay or contradiction, or else…  Whatever happened to debate clubs or moot courts? They must’ve gone the way of five-and-dime stores and integrity.

Is the Secret Service Being Used as a Trump Kill Switch?

HILLARY CLINTON cannot help herself. She must force herself into the spotlight because she hasn’t been relevant for a long time. A good topic on which she can opine (and project) due to her advanced Trump Derangement Syndrome. 

It manifested itself this week when she claimed, without evidence, that Trump wants to kill his opposition in a podcast interview with far-left Dem activist attorney, Marc Elias, who assisted her in manufacturing the Trump-Russia-collusion hoax. For good measure, she compared Trump to Putin, hoping it would stick this time: 

“Putin does what [Trump] would like to do. Kill his opposition, imprison his opposition, drive journalists into exile, rule without any check or balance. That’s what Trump really wants. And so we have to be very conscious of how he sees the world because in that world, he only sees strong men leaders. He sees Putin. He sees Xi. He sees Kim Jong Un in North Korea. Those are the people he is modeling himself after and we’ve been down this road in our, you know, world history. We sure don’t want to go down that again.”

Talk about being a ‘bitter clinger.’ 

Elias replied, “You have been right about everything. I feel like you were cheated. I think that your election was not on the up and up because Russia got involved… and Donald Trump, and all that.” 

Talk about being a so-called ‘election denier.’ 

Hillary then replied, “If he ever gets back near the White House again, it will be like having a dictator. I don’t say that lightly. Go back and read Project 2025. They’re going to fire everybody. The person in the government who knows about the next pandemic? Get rid of him.”

The podcast was a perfect segue for other news of the week. On Friday, Dems in Congress advanced a bill to remove Secret Service protection for Trump (and ostensibly any other similarly situated candidates, of which there are none) should he/they be convicted of a crime. It’s essentially a law to allow Trump to be [Jeffrey] ‘Epsteined,’ so named for the sicko pedo that got killed in a New York City prison after the security cameras accidentally-on-purpose failed, allowing him to be hanged in his cell without a culprit ever being caught. In fact, it was conveniently described as a suicide, though almost no one believes it.

Rep. Bennie Thompson, a Dem, introduced a resolution to terminate Trump’s protection and unveiled legislation, H.R. 8081, called the DISGRACED Act, or “Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable Former Protectees Act.” Though technically it would apply to any protectee convicted and sentenced on federal or state felony charges, it was unmistakably aimed at President Trump in light of his upcoming show trials.

Thompson had this to say:

“It is regrettable that it has come to this, but this previously unthought-of scenario could become our reality. Therefore, it is necessary for us to be prepared and update the law so the American people can be assured that protective status does not translate into special treatment —and that those who are sentenced to prison will indeed serve the time required of them.”

Chief political correspondent for the Washington Examiner, Byron York, synopsized the intent aptly: “Obvious subtext here is that removing USSS would make it easier for someone to kill Trump, which is arguably the goal of Thompson’s bill, H.R. 8081.” 

Indeed, Dems would have multiple bites at three gigantic Epstein apples, given Trump is facing charges in Alvin Bragg’s New York ‘hush money’ case; Fani Willis’ Georgia RICO case; and Jack Smith’s 40 federal felony charges case.

I don’t know since when Dems have been so concerned with law and order, or since when they have been concerned about the federal budget, but going out on a limb, I highly doubt Thompson has suddenly turned a new leaf here. Maybe it’s just me being cynical?

How about this? Let’s take away Bill Clinton’s Secret Service protection over his philandering and lying under oath, or Hillary’s, for her fraudulent scam against the 45th President?

Johnson Won’t Resign. Should He Be Made to Vacate the Chair?

MANY IN THE U.S. House of Representatives, and their constituencies, had high hopes for the new G.O.P. speaker from Louisiana, Mike Johnson. Alas, he has been a big disappointment. There are a number of reasons, but among them is the budget. Johnson, who appeared to be a hawk as he proclaimed he would never pass legislation securing other nations’ borders before our own, has since advocated sending taxpayer money to Volodymyr Zelensky’s corrupt Ukrainian regime that continues to beg for yet more funding to vanquish Moscow. President Trump had once supported Johnson—who knows if he still does.

Calling himself a “wartime speaker” to rationalize his about face, Johnson has effectively morphed into a Dem, anxious to pour an endless stream of the national budget not to our own southern border, but to a land where we have no vital national interest to fight a war against everyone’s favorite boogeyman, the Russian Federation’s Vladimir Putin. To be abundantly clear, our own border has descended even further into the abyss of hell since his speakership and is only more chaotic and dangerous by the day with not one bloody red cent allocated or spent to improve the situation. So, too, are other issues weighing heavily on American households, such as inflation (especially for necessities such as food). For some reason, possibly sinister, Johnson’s tune seem to abruptly change after he was serenaded by Biden in the White House, who is clearly compromised by Kiev, and never been held accountable for his own corruption.

As of Wednesday, Johnson announced the House would vote on Saturday on a yet-to-be released foreign aid package amounting to tens of billions more for Ukraine, as well as for Israel and Taiwan. Included in the funding bills will also be the REPO Act, a TikTok bill, and other measures relating to Russia, China, and Iran. All four bills need only a House majority to pass. Johnson is effectively exploiting the desire to fund Israel to push through the rest of the bullsh!t. He also hopes he’ll pick up Dems to prop up his imperiled speakership given a number in the G.O.P. are outraged by his betrayal to the extent of requesting his resignation—e.g., Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.), Thomas Massie (Ky.) and Matt Gaetz (Fla.). Inexplicably, once in the Senate, they won’t be forced to vote each bill up or down—only as a whole.

We read Biden “strongly supports” Johnson’s nearly one-trillion sellout (that would make Nancy Pelosi blush) and that’s all we really need to know. It’s of further note his top policy advisor, Dan Ziegler, is a former lobbyist with clients who have a corporate interest in Ukraine. ) Ziegler isn’t the only one, either, according to a recent report in Breitbart.) 

This isn’t the only thing that has pissed off his brethren in the House. Johnson has flinched on advancing DEI; buying a new F.B.I. building to reward the Deep State; withholding the Jan. 6th tapes despite his promise to release them; and most recently, the renewal of Sec. 702 of FISA without a warrant requirement. Ordinarily, I’d cut Johnson some slack given the one-seat majority of the G.O.P. in the House, but at this point, make him resign or vacate the chair. At least that way, the Dems will have to run on the mess they made.

It’s Time for Dark Brandon to Exit Stage Left.

THURSDAY NIGHT marked the fourth, and hopefully final State of the Union address of Dark Brandon’s. A copy of his cleaned-up, corrected address is here, but it’s better to watch it to capture the (black) magick of the moment, including its hostile tone, flighty associations, convoluted ideas, and flat-out wrong assertions, and surprisingly few gaffs. Random observations include:

At the outset, Biden acknowledged a little problem with inflation, though he missed the point. He said (paraphrasing because that’s all anyone can do with his incongruous, angry speech) he was going to tackle the inflation problem by demanding manufactures stop falsely advertising. He cited as an example, a bag of potato chips that is packaged in the same size bag today as it was pre-Biden, suggesting to an unaware public there was no change when there really was. Never mind one can simply look at the weight of the contents which is already clearly marked on the package per consumer laws already in existence. Biden’s priorities are most perplexing.

At one point, in a thinly-veiled threat to the institution, Biden seemed to threaten to pack the U.S. Supreme Court if the justices (some of whom were present and to whom he directly screamed at) didn’t shape up on the issue of ‘reproductive freedom,’ with whatever fuzzy meaning you wish to ascribe to the phrase. These days, it means more than availability of legal abortions in certain circumstances. It also means ‘gender-affirming care’ for ‘trans-kids,’ or, as many of us view it, freedom to mutilate children to fulfill perverse fantasies. The kids can ‘chose’ to be mutilated even though they aren’t legally competent to sign an I.O.U. at the local candy store. Or, they can presumably be mutilated by parental decree. (A whole generation appears to have missed Mr. Graves’ freshman high school biology class on X and Y chromosomes, apparently, because they don’t seem to understand boys can’t really have babies, but this is the strange world we live in.) 

At another pertinent point, Rep. Majorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) was heard in background asking Biden to say Laken Riley’s name. (Recall she was the nursing student brutally murdered by an illegal alien recently, who stole America’s heart.) Biden has said nothing of her or any of the many other Americans who have suffered severe or deadly crimes because of his irresponsible open borders policy. He viciously sneered at MTG, adding he felt for her parents since he, too, lost a child. He was referring to his son, Beau, who died from brain cancer, but who Biden falsely and repeatedly claims died in the Iraq War. You see, it’s always all about Joey.

Joey saved his most passionate moments of his 65 minute address to discuss Ukraine and Israel. Of Ukraine, he blasted (read: literally screamed) the House for failing to pass ‘the package’ sending good taxpayer money after bad to that tortured country and its corrupt money laundering leader, Zelensky, to fight that dastardly Putin, the scourge of the Earth. As for Israel, Biden glossed over the fact it was attacked by Hamas, and instead emphasized that he was (apparently on his own initiative) earmarking substantial sums of money to build infrastructure to ship vast amounts of aid to the Palestinians, who will probably never see any of it after Hamas sells it off.

As for the Biden-made border crisis and invasion of illegal aliens into the country, Biden turned to his old playbook and simply blamed Trump. (He speaks in non sequiturs, so I can’t really explain it.) He also blamed dangerous MAGA Republicans (a term he actually coined and was endeared by Trump’s supporters so much, the 45th president adopted it.) This is unequivocally factually false, but Biden only fleetingly flirts with the truth and is only occasionally tethered to reality.  

Biden also went into a favorite old tirade of his about the rich paying their “fair share” of taxes. He should know only about one-half of Americans pay any federal income tax at all (and some even get ‘free’ money in the form of refundable credits back from the government). Those Americans who do pay taxes pay a lot, especially when you add up all the other taxes they pay, including, but not limited to state income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, and excise taxes. Even with all the taxes the middle class and wealthy pay, it’s no where near enough to pay the nation’s ever-ballooning bills, so maybe the problem isn’t taxes, but spending. Washington writ large, and Biden, don’t want to recognize this fact any more than want to admit men can’t have babies, so they just spend money anyway and charge it to the next generation who will rightfully think we’re a bunch of assholes who mortgaged their futures.

If there was any question before Thursday night that Biden wouldn’t be the Dem candidate for president in 2024, it was quashed. He will, and the campaign will be run exactly like it was in 2020. His domestic campaign issues are welcoming who he now calls “newcomers,” i.e., illegal aliens; abortion; ‘free’ student loans; and “junk fees.” His international policies will be good-Zelensky, bad-Patin, and humanitarian aid to Hamas, i.e., the aggressors in the latest round of fighting in Israel. He will go out of his way to alienate, humiliate, insult, and intimidate MAGA Republicans, including what he thinks is the Grand Wizard of the movement, Donald Trump. 

The Republican response to the State of the Union address was given by Sen Katie Britt (R-Ala.). At first, I thought she was crying, but then thought it was almost an expression of disbelief at what she had just heard. She is very young. (Her speech here.) After, 1.9 million viewers were tuned into Tucker Carlson on X, who opined on the evening. Alex Jones later joined him, which made for an interesting combination. With similar opinions, the two men seem to share little else in common, but they have developed some comradery over their experiences in being censored. 

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., running as an independent, struggled to be heard through it all, sending out emails and social media content on his opinions. On the ballots in four states, he expects to make it onto all of them and essentially run on normalizing things. He may be as much a disruptor as Ross Perot in 1992. He was thought more likely to hurt Biden than Trump. Probably.

UPDATE: On 3/08, it was reported third-party advocate No Labels would announce its presidential candidate next week. It’s rumored to be Kyrsten Sinema. Or not. Sinema was a Dem Senator from Arizona who turned independent in ’22 and decided to not seek reelection in ’24.

“Слава Україні! Slava Ukraini, America Be Damned.”

THE DEMS IN THE SENATE literally stayed up all night ironing out details for, and debating, a $95 billion giveaway plan for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan and managed to persuade some 22 recalcitrant Republicans to join their ignoble cause. Of course, the Republican leader in the Senate is the fossil known as Mitch McConnell. He’s Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s b!tch. In the wee morning hours, the package passed, 70-29. 

Remarkably the Russian bogeyman, Vladimir Putin, was the purported impetus for passage because, you know, we all want to stand with the Ukrainian kleptocracy and its corrupt oligarchs to ‘save our democracy,’ which is the fail-safe phrase Dems waltz out when they don’t have a compelling rationale for what they are demanding. 

Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) was particularly adamant this giveaway package be defeated. “It puts Ukraine first and America last,” he said, adding, “I love to talk. That’s one of my favorite things to do. Yes, and I slept all day yesterday waiting for this. I’m going to take Adderall—nah, I’m just kidding.” Maybe. Maybe not. Many adults use Adderall to stay focused, but there’s been a major shortage attributed to supply chain problems.

This stunt was the news Americans woke up to on Tuesday, but it was quickly followed up with an assurance by House Speaker Mike Johnson, who said, paraphrasing, the House wouldn’t even be taking the bill up because, as he had made clear, it would have to include vital security provisions—for the f—-ing USA, NOT Ukraine!—and this obviously did not.He said:

“House Republicans were crystal clear from the very beginning of discussions that any so-called national security supplemental legislation must recognize that national security begins at our own border.”

He added: “In the absence of having received any single border policy change from the Senate, the House will have to continue to work its own will on these important matters.”

At some point, before falling into a deep slumber after an exhausting Congressional fight before the (ass) kissing and making up (facts) across the aisle, Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio) uncovered some language that disturbed him. He issued and distributed a memo on it, the gist of which said the bill would handcuff the next president on such spending because the funding under the bill cannot expire until nine months into the next presidency. Theoretically, Vance says, President Trump could get impeached once reelected and wanting to advance his own policy that runs contrary to Biden’s. A copy of Vance’s Memo is here. He followed up with an article in The American Conservative, entitled “The Republican Plot Against Donald Trump: The Inside Story of How Congress is Pursuing Endless War in Ukraine—and Trying to Stop a Trump Election,” here. For a change, it takes command of the narrative. Of note, Vance is on Trump’s VP short list.

When the U.S. Congress Cares More About Ukraine’s Border than Ours…

JUST BECAUSE I HAVEN’T written about it lately doesn’t mean Ukraine doesn’t continue to be in the news. It’s just that under the Biden regime, there is more (bad) news than most of us can reasonably keep up with. 

Recall that from Jan. ’22 through July ’23, the U.S. gave away nearly $77 billion in aid to Ukraine in its wearisome burden for economically strapped American taxpayers trying to survive ‘Bidenomics’ and ‘Bidenflation.’ Going on two months ago, the idiot occupying the White House, Joey Biden, asked Congress for another $60 billion+for Kyiv (along with $14 billion more for Israel), but Congress has thus far demurred, thanks to a few good House Republicans.

Meanwhile, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan whines about running out of time: “A vote against supporting Ukraine is a vote to improve (Vladimir) Putin’s strategic position,” he said. And Office of Management and Budget Director Shalanda Young warned that the sudden end of funding will “kneecap” Ukraine on the battlefield. 

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has warned the West that there will be more “bad news” from Ukraine in a television interview in Germany over the weekend. He spoke of a “critical situation” without the West increasing ammunition production. But the Germans, too, are growing war weary and sympathy fatigued, with an official saying that if Germany had to enter a major war at this point, it would only last “two days in battle” because of all the ammo they’ve supplied to Kyiv.

Congress is playing football (or maybe whac-a-mole) with the Ukraine question. Newly-minted House Speaker Mike Johnson has made it clear that aid to Ukraine cannot happen without some serious attention to the existential crisis continuing unabated at our southern border. And he doesn’t want additional Israel aid tied to Ukraine funding. (The House passed the Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act on Nov. 2nd, allocating $14.3 billion in emergency funding for Tel Aviv which the Democrat Senate has yet to take up.) Johnson also wants an accounting of monies spent thus far by Kyiv. 

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-Calif.), however, plans to bring up the combined Ukraine/Israel aid package to the floor this week sans immigration controls. On Tuesday, however, Zelensky had been expected to remotely address a classified Senate briefing and House lawmakers, but abruptly canceled last minute while tantruming at Congress’ failure to appropriate more American taxpayers’ money and threatening to lose the war because of that failure.

That’s what that corrupt creep, Volodymyr Zelensky, gets for trusting his equally corrupt brethren in D.C., Joey Biden, for sticking by Ukraine “for as long as it takes,” or for as long as he can remember, whichever is shorter. Just two weeks ago, Biden’s promise reverberated in the words of his Defense Secretary, Lloyd Austin, when he traveled to Ukraine and publicly swore to Zelensky, with his fingers crossed behind his back, “We will remain with you for the long-haul.” 

No doubt, Putin has been banking on this. After all, what happens in the region is a helluva lot more important to him (and Zelensky) than it is to the rest of the world, writ large. And with the utter failure of the mystical and elusive counteroffensive, Putin has been enriched. It will boil down to a war of attrition. (It is thought that the C.I.A. knew full well the counteroffensive was destined for failure from the start, which is disconcerting, to say the least.)

Still, the war rages on. Last week, an unnamed source to The Sun claimed Ukraine’s S.B.U. intelligence service was behind a massive explosion in a rail tunnel in Russia’s far east. It was believed a train was carrying weapons being supplied to Putin from his pal, Xi Xingping. That attack supplemented an earlier  spate of sabotage raids by Ukraine against Russian factories, railways, and airfields deep within Russian territory.

It might be time to revisit Elon Musk’s solution (future political candidate à la Trump?)to the Russia-Ukraine problem, here. That, and a swift kick in the ass out of office for tyrants, both Zelensky and Biden, would solve some of the world’s most urgent problems. 

This Week in War (Summer Edition) PART SECOND

The Biden regime hasn’t forgotten about UKRAINE (Never!) in all the fervor over Taiwan. Due to an ‘accounting error,’ (of which there appear to be many under Brandon), the regime announced the second of two recent arms packages for Kiev, this latest one worth $250 million, and includes HIMARS ammo, AIM-9 missiles, artillery rounds, and an assortment of other military equipment. It uses the PDA, weapons directly taken from Pentagon stockpiles. (The first package was announced on Aug. 14th, and included highly controversial cluster bombs.) 

The ‘accounting error?’ The Pentagon says it overvalued arms sent to Ukraine earlier, which frees up an additional $6.2 billion to continue fueling the flames in a corrupt proxy war against Russia. Congress has authorized $113 billion in war spending since the war began. 

While on what appears to be a perpetual summer vacation, Biden has managed to ask Congress to authorize yet another $24 billion on the proxy war. And meanwhile, direct U.S. complicity in the proxy war is increasing by leaps and bounds. Ukraine has significantly increased drone attacks to Russia’s interior, but is using Western (read: U.S.) intelligence to do it, despite Washington’s claim it is not encouraging or enabling the operations. Some 42 drone attacks targeted Crimea on Friday alone, and are only expected to increase. And, according to The Economist, the purpose of the attacks, to psychologically impact civilians, shows the drones are purposely targeting ordinary Russians

Meanwhile, Central European NATO members, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia, are demanding Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko expel around 10,000 Wagner fighters who entered in June, after Yevgeny Prigozhin’s failed mutiny (and what is now believed to be his recent assassination.) 

Poland, undoubtedly emboldened by the U.S. regime, had ordered a deployment of up to 10,000 of its own troops on the Belarus border. Russian President Vladimir Putin, who is still alive despite press reports claiming he was terminally ill for years, has said he will consider an attack on Belarus as one on Russia, which is rather measured under the circumstances. 

The buildup of troops provoked a stronger response from Lukashenko, who has threatened to use Russian nuclear weapons in response to “aggression from NATO.” This has no hope of ending anytime soon, and indeed, senior U.S. officials are poised to back Kiev against Moscow even beyond next year, if necessary. And it will be necessary until diplomacy instead of warfare is used, according to pro-Biden newspaper, The Washington Post and columnist David Ignatius

The U.S. position seems rather foolhardy, given Putin’s fight is an existential one with much more at stake for Russians than Americans, and given the fully-anticipated failure of the Ukrainian counteroffensive despite a massive influx of money and weapons. 

But the U.S. and Ukraine aren’t even seeing eye to eye these days, according to The Wall Street Journal. The U.S. wants Ukraine to use “combined arms” tactics they were taught from NATO at training in Europe (!). Americans also want Ukraine to focus on severing Russia’s land bridge to Crimea at the Sea of Azov. Ukraine, conversely, sees the conflict as requiring air superiority, which they do not have (nor do the Russians, for that matter.) 

That all may change, though, as the scheduled training of pilots in Europe has been replaced with a plan for the Pentagon to train Ukrainians on F-16 fighter jets in the U.S. starting in September, according to The New York Times. First, they must be taught English in Texas, then on to flight school in Arizona. It is expected it can be accomplished in under a year. 

Moscow will surely view this as an American escalation, especially since the F-16s can carry nuclear weapons. That view is only exacerbated by Poland’s and Slovakia’s sending of Soviet-made MiG-29 fighter jets to Ukraine earlier this year, making NATO appear to be, and in fact, being, a direct entrant into the war. 

If you are to believe American press, (and you shouldn’t), democracy itself is at stake. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who had previously put his country under martial law until at least Nov. 15th  and canceled all elections in that period, said on Sunday that Ukraine could have elections during the war if only the U.S. and Europe ponied up enough money for them to hold a vote in October. In the interim, the eleven opposition parties in Ukraine are banned and the media there has been nationalized. (Premonitory, perhaps?). 

And if you are to believe American officials, like, say, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, Ukraine is assured of further Congressional approval for war spending, even if House Speaker Kevin McCarthy might have a tough sell bringing  it to the floor because of increasing G.O.P. (and American) opposition. Indeed, a CNN poll found 55% of Americans oppose more spending on Ukraine.

Alarmingly, the current U.S. regime and its allies are negotiating deals for long-term military support to Ukraine that future administrations would be hard-pressed to exit, according to The Wall Street Journal. The idea is a simple one: lock in long-term pledges of G-7 nations and others (said to number 18) to telegraph to the Kremlin that it cannot simply wait out the Biden regime in hopes the new Trump administration will significantly scale back support for Kiev. 

While the Biden regime cannot legally bind a future president, it can set the stage to make it difficult, especially of G.O.P. hawks remain in Congress. The regime can also issue a long-term memorandum of understanding regarding support for Ukraine, which would not require Congressional approval. It would provide Ukraine annual military aid from the U.S., much like we provide Israel

If one didn’t know any better and were sufficiently paranoid and into ‘conspiracy theories,’ one might think that this is Biden’s ‘payback’ to the co-conspirators in his international corruption schemes that have made his family wealthy beyond imagination, and at the same time, compromised the United States on the world stage. 

The only question then becomes, is it payback in the sense he is robbing American taxpayers to pay for these nations’ welfare and wars? Or is it payback in the sense he is actually burdening these nations by provoking international war with them being both the subject and the arena of lethal conflict? Is it a case of no act going unthanked or of no act going unpunished? 

Maybe it’s both and Brandon’s having the last laugh. One thing is sure: the American taxpayers are not laughing, and won’t be for a very long time.

Saint Anselm’s Anthological Argument

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP began campaign season Y1 of the Presidential Campaign of 2024 at a Town Hall aired, strangely enough, by CNN, in, appropriately enough, New Hampshire. The network must’ve needed a ratings boost. (N.B. It got one.)

The site was perfect: St. Anselm’s College in Manchester. The school is known for its polling, considered to be quite accurate in the Granite State. The CNN ‘moderator,’ 31-year-old Kaitlan Collins, however, was neither perfect nor quite accurate. She was, as DJT so aptly put it, nasty, despite her angelic-and inappropriate white pantsuit. She pulled all the old Dem tricks from its magician’s handbook. She accused Trump of doing what Dems themselves do. And she wouldn’t let him get a word in edgewise. It was, to use another Trumpism, an absolute disgrace. 

At the outset, Kaitlan wanted Trump’s comments on his civil court loss in Manhattan from the day before. Trump didn’t take it seriously, and admitted he didn’t because the claim was ludicrous and the lawsuit was bankrolled by political enemies with a sinister agenda. (More has come out about that already.) Trump’s response garnered a lot of attention by adversaries in the press on Thursday.

Early on, she also focused heavily on the 2020 election, in hopes of getting DJT to ‘admit’ it wasn’t rigged or stolen. She did not succeed. She asked him if he would guarantee accepting election results in 2024, to which DJT responded he would, if it were a fair and honest election. It was a fair and honest answer she would not accept. So she answered for him: “no.” Well, okay, if you’re admitting it won’t be fair or honest. She drove the line of inquiry primarily, but participants in the Town Hall, consisting of G.O.P. or undeclared voters in NH, were allowed to ask some questions, to which Kaitlan quickly chimed in to rephrase for the CNN audience.

DJT did not allow her to take over, despite risking the not-good look of being assertive with a woman. He did it with aplomb, though, because most of the time, she was interrupting him or arguing with him as if she herself was running against him in the primary. One question from a participant at the Town Hall involved how to keep Putin under control in the Ukraine situation. The question presumed Putin was the bad guy, but when Kaitlan paraphrased it, Putin was transfixed into the devil incarnate so how would DJT burn his effigy, indeed demonic self, in Hell? 

DJT didn’t take the bait, and undoubtedly had Dem viewers saying it was evidence of his “ties” with Russian President Vladimir Putin. DJT just said he’d promptly cut the funding for the war in concert with our allies and call Putin and his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to the table to negotiate peace. When she pushed him to say who he supported, he demurred, saying only he wanted the killing to stop. It was an excellent answer in that uniquely unpolished, but sincere way DJT has and the Town Hall (and television) audience loved it. He sounded experienced. He sounded like a statesman.

Is Putin a war criminal, Kaitlan pressed. Again, Trump refused to answer explaining if he were, now would be a poor time to say so—before trying to negotiate a peace. Of course. Biden answered the exact same question in a different setting, “No.” He immediately retracted and said “yes.” Not even decisive. 

Asked if he would pardon J6 defendants, Trump said he would seriously consider pardoning most of them, depending on their particular circumstances. It was a reasonable position, Kaitlan talked about officer injuries that day. Trump talked about unarmed peaceful veteran, Ashli Babbitt, who was shot in her neck at point-blank range by a cop for no apparent reason, killing her instantly. It was taped.

Kaitlan harped on the J6 narrative because her ilk think that calling it an insurrection is the key to getting Biden ‘re-elected.’ She stated he didn’t do anything to stop the so-called insurrection. This is factually untrue, and Trump was prepared. He pulled a piece of paper out of his pocket and read off a list of every statement, every Tweet, every comment he made, and the times he made them all, to try to control the crowd. Kaitlan didn’t like it, but the audience did. 

The only question DJT tripped up on in this writer’s opinion was the one on abortion from the audience. Trump harped on his Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe v. Wade, and the extreme positions of Dems (who think the right to abortion should attach until right after birth, making the procedure at that point, infanticide.) But he didn’t say it articulately. He should’ve said it is, and always was a political question that belonged with the states, almost all of which believe abortion should be legal, within certain parameters. What those limitations are can be quibbled over, but it is not a federal question. And it certainly isn’t a Constitutional right, absolute or otherwise. He needs to improve that answer, IMO.

About 45 minutes into the Town Hall, after a commercial break, Trump was no longer seated, but instead, stood to give his remaining answers. It’s not clear why he did this. And the program ended 69 minutes in, even though TV guides indicated the program was scheduled for 90 minutes. It was thought CNN pulled the plug on the show because Kaitlan was getting molested by The Donald, figuratively, of course. One report later said this wasn’t the case, and perhaps it wasn’t. Regardless, the Town Hall was more instructive due to the questions CNN did and didn’t ask than by any answers that could be given, but that was by design. 

One Newsmax commentator noticed that when Trump walks into a room, it is the people he acknowledges, not the reporter or host or colleague. Things like that tend to make Trump likable, albeit in a way not everyone is willing to recognize. Such was the case Wednesday night in NH. The audience loved Trump. 

The best was yet to come in a focus group held immediately afterward by CNN’s Gary Tuchman. Conservative talk show host Mike Gallagher commented about it:

GALLAGHER: I can’t get enough of this. I have never seen such a self own on national TV in my life. Kaitlan Collins starts the whole conversation or town hall last night asking Trump, “you keep alleging the 2020 election was rigged and that is a lie and you keep repeating a lie”. It is not a lie. It is an opinion and a belief that millions of Americans have that there were tons of shenanigans and problems with the integrity of the 2020 election. Election integrity is one of the most important issues on the hearts and minds of most Americans. The Left and Trump haters are gaslighting you. They want you to believe it is not important. They want you to think it is all settled. Forget your lying eyes of people shoving ballots in boxes and 24/7 drive thru voting and ballot locations in Houston and the mysterious flood that caused them to stop counting votes in the middle of the night. Americans know that there were plenty of problems with the 2020 election with the pre tense of Covid restrictions. Trump didn’t bring it up last night. She did. She started the whole town hall harping on the election integrity issue of 2020. After the town hall, here is CNN’s Gary Tuchman with a focus group.

TUCHMAN: Does it bother you that he talks about 2020 and not 2024? I’ll ask you first. This is Jonathan Leslie. He is 40. Republican, voted for Trump twice. How do you feel about the lies?

Focus Group Participant Leslie: Part of it is the media narrative as you asked him in the town hall about the 2020 election rather than current stuff.

TUCHMAN: Don’t you think it is time for him to talk about 2024 and not lies that aren’t true?

LESLIE: Couldn’t the media have asked him about 2024?

TUCHMAN: You’re right. That’s something on our mind. That is why it was asked first.

The exchange can be viewed here. Notably, CNN has had a management change with new CEO Chris Licht at the helm. It’s thought by some he may move the network away from its toxically leftist rhetoric. We’ll see. In the meantime, it appears as if a veritable anthology of praise is rolling in for Trump’s performance Wednesday night and, indeed, from 2016-2020. 

Mr. Zelensky Goes to Finland.

Mr. Zelensky Goes to Finland.

THIS WEEK, news broke that Russia had been hit by a pair of drone strikes. President Vladimir Putin was displeased when he learned of the loud flash over the roof of the Russian Senate building. He reached the conclusion it was an American attempt to assassinate him. He vowed revenge. D.C. denied it, as did its comrade in arms, Kiev, which called the Kremlin claim ‘disinformation.’

Fortunately, Putin was not in the Kremlin at the time. ‘Fortunately,’ since there is no guarantee if he were killed his replacement would be any more pro-Western. Russia said the drones were shot down by the military and security services using advanced radar warfare systems. Although the explosions caused fragments to fly into the Kremlin, there were no injuries or serious property damage.“We regard these actions as a planned terrorist act and an attempt on the president,” Putin’s office responded in a statement. Just a guess on my part, but that’s probably what the C.I.A. was hoping they’d say. Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev called for the “elimination” of Zelensky. Speaker of the Russian parliament Vyacheslav Volodin suggested a nuclear strike.

Ukrainian dictator Volodymyr Zelensky denied any complicity, accusing Moscow of being behind the attack itself as a pretext for escalating the war between the two nations. He wasted no time having his spokesperson say theirs was an “exclusively defensive war” that doesn’t attack in the Russian Federation. How that squares with the expected spring counteroffensive due to begin any day now isn’t clear. How it squares with prior Ukrainian drone strikes deep in the Russian territories as far as Moscow isn’t any clearer.  Zelensky himself, while whining for weapons in new NATO member Finland, claimed the assassination charge was a desperate one.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken told The Washington Post it was “hard to comment or speculate on this without really knowing what the facts are.”  Now there is a bastion of clarity. So the childish game of ‘yes-you-did, no-I-didn’t’ continues between the Kremlin and White House. Indeed, Russian drones attacked Kiev in retaliation of what Russia blamed on the U.S. and at least one was shot down. Zelensky, have moved his whining to The Hague and International Court of Justice, called for Putin to be brought to justice in a new tribunal created for that purpose. Meanwhile, the U.S. sent another financial aid package to Kiev. How drones initially bypassed Moscow’s ring of steel air defences remains a mystery.

The U.K.’s Toxic Waste to Be Donated to a Bad Cause

WHAT ON EARTH ARE PEOPLE THINKING?! (They’re not, therein lies the problem!)

The U.K. has confirmed its intention to send depleted uranium shells to Ukraine so they may be used in the British-made Challenger 2 tanks in the Ukraine/Russia conflict. Not surprisingly, Russia is opposed to this move and considers it, correctly, as a means to create so-called ‘dirty bombs.’ 

The written confirmation of this fact appeared in the British Parliament’s website: “Alongside our granting of a squadron of Challenger 2 main battle tanks to Ukraine, we will be providing ammunition including armor piercing rounds which contain depleted uranium. Such rounds are highly effective in defeating modern tanks and armored vehicles.” 

Depleted uranium is a byproduct if enriched uranium and is extremely dense, as well as radioactive. It is linked to birth defects and cancer as exhibited in Iraq, when U.S. forces used it during the Gulf War and 2003 invasion of the country. The effects are still felt in the Iraqi city of Fallujah.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has so far been the sanest-of-insane participants in the Ukrainian conflict, has warned the West, through Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu, that if this plan materializes, it will bring the world closer to a “nuclear collision,: who added, “Naturally, Russia has something to answer this with.” 

Putin reiterated, “If all this happens, Russia will have to respond accordingly, given that the West collectively is already beginning to use weapons with a nuclear component,” after the summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Moscow last week. 

It all may be a moot point, however, if the U.S. Bradley Fighting Vehicles it has sent to Ukraine were armed with radioactive depleted uranium rounds. Bradleys are known as ‘tank killers’ for a reason. The U.S. is mum on the issue, so it’s probably a safe bet the depleted uranium was sent, special delivery, by the mentally-impaired and corrupt occupant of the White House, Joey Biden, to the very crazy and corrupt Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.